A/A- [Excellent]

B+/B [Good]

Thesis

crystal clear, persuasive, insightful, original

understandable or promising, yet rather unclear or unoriginal

Structure

evident, solid and smooth, appropriate to the topic/thesis

largely identifiable despite a few orphaned sentences or paragraphs

Use of Evidence

present when required, seamlessly & creatively integrated into topic and supportive sentences, accurately documented [MLA or Chicago]

occasionally insufficient, inaccurate or inappropriate, yet largely reasonable

Analysis

interpretative labor of thinking, fresh, incisive, to the point

mini-theses broadly supported despite occasional loss of focus

Logical Steps

mini-theses solidly and fluidly constructed, counter-arguments and/or immediately relevant points considered and/or mentioned

usually and generally reasonable, yet weak due to lack of dialectical reasoning and/or explorative thinking

Mechanics

flawless grammar, precise diction, (near-)perfect punctuations

occasional lapses in grammar and diction, minor copy-editing issues (10%)

 

 

 

 

B-/C+ [Borderline/Mediocre]

C/C- [Needs Help]

Thesis

generally unclear, vague or unoriginal despite some visible attempts

difficult or too bland to identify, nearly absent

Structure

generally unclear with too many orphaned sentences or paragraphs

unclear or confusing, in need of more topic sentences

Use of Evidence

generally insufficient or inappropriate, poorly integrated external source

very few or weak, unintegrated citations

Analysis

weak, uninterpreted, irrelevant or contradictory citations and/or authorial thoughts that require more analytic attention

very little or weak attempt to relate evidence or thoughts to argument

Logical Steps

often weak or fallacious, counter-arguments or alternatives unrepresented

no visible flow of ideas, no effort to grasp alternative views

Mechanics

Notable problems in grammar and diction (30%)

Critical problems in grammar and diction (50%)

 

 

 

 

D/D- [Poor/Disastrous]

 

Thesis

extremely weak; unsupported by the rest of the paper

 

Structure

evidently unorganized, almost nonexistent

 

Use of Evidence

weak or incorrect or nonexistent

 

Analysis

absent

 

Logical Steps

no discernable argument made

 

Mechanics

Almost unreadable grammar and diction, major rewriting required (70%)